Postby brynn » Sat Jun 23, 2012 11:12 am
If all the sections involved could be made to match units of a grid, you could use snapping, and count gridlines, so that you place the loose end in the right place, to maintain the original length. However, that would only work if you were dealing with a 90 degree angle.....unless you can do some complicated math.
If I'm not mistaken, a true measuring tool is under development. I can't remember if it's targetted for 0.49 or not.
Until then, you could use Extensions menu > Visualize Path > Measure Path. What it does, is actually print the measurement, which is really not ideal in most cases. But it's better than nothing, if you need to measure a line (or area). That's about all I can think of.
Although I have to say, that some kind of feature that would allow endnodes to be moved, without the path actually getting longer or shorter, could be quite useful.
......hhmmmmm......you know what that reminds me of though......thinking of the distance between the endnode and the next node, as the radius of a circle.....I'm not sure where this is going.....but if you could center a circle on the node next to the endnode, then by geometric definition, any point along the circle will result in the path not getting any longer. So that if that node next to the endnode is fixed, you should be able to use a circle and achieve what you want. I could draw up an example, if you like.
However, if you're not sure that node is fixed, as far as conceiving a fenceline, that wouldn't work. If that node (fencepost) is not fixed, you'd have to keep drawing different circles in a trial and error process.
And using a circle would only address moving the endnodes. Given a straight line you could not move any nodes between the endnodes, at all, without changing the path length. So any scenario like you describe would have to involve moving the endnodes. Right?
I think the circle idea should work, unless I don't understand the problem correctly.