BobSongs wrote:I think Inkscape doesn't have to be compared with software X or package Y. The question is: can it produce what an artist requires?:D
I think it's a wee bit more complicated than that. It works nicely when everyone in your team is either using same Inkscape/GIMP/whatever combo as you do or is happy with flattened standard exported data such as PNG or PDF or EPS.
But when you deal with people outside who have workflows built around particular tools, this is where issues start raising their ugly heads. Just few days ago someone told me he needed CDR exporting, because the company he works with demands CDR files for sending designs to a plotter. They just won't accept SVG. Then don't do anything in Corel DRAW they wouldn't be able to do with, say, Inkscape + InkCut. Nevertheless they demand CDR and do everything in Corel DRAW. End of story

Then, of course, there are habits that are a hard thing to break. The whole GIMPshop thing, remember? In my daily life I often stumble upon quite arrogant people who think that we owe it to them to make our software just like Adobe's or Corel's. Personally I think there's enough place for different solutions on the market.
So, as long as we finish and polish all things we intended to do and provide reasonable compatibility with the world outside, we are in the winner's camp. Despite of haters who are gonna hate and whiners who are gonna whine
