| Mc | meeting time ? | Nov 06 10:00 |
|---|---|---|
| tedg | Yup. | Nov 06 10:00 |
| tedg | ================ BOARD MEETING START ================ | Nov 06 10:00 |
| tedg | https://wiki.inkscape.org/wiki/index.php?title=Board_Meetings#Agenda | Nov 06 10:00 |
| bryce | *wave* | Nov 06 10:00 |
| inkchatbot | <ScislaC> hello | Nov 06 10:00 |
| tedg | bryce: do you want to run the agenda or would you like me to? | Nov 06 10:00 |
| bryce | either way's fine | Nov 06 10:01 |
| tedg | You got it. | Nov 06 10:01 |
| bryce | ok great | Nov 06 10:01 |
| bryce | === Apple Developer Membership Status === | Nov 06 10:01 |
| inkchatbot | <Tav> Hi! | Nov 06 10:01 |
| bryce | the board's already on the mailing list thread so already knows the status | Nov 06 10:02 |
| bryce | but to summarize for the public, there's an issue with licensing on the apple store, where GPLv3 code doesn't fit but GPLv2 does | Nov 06 10:02 |
| inkchatbot | <doctormo> Hello | Nov 06 10:03 |
| tedg | One question I had, but didn't put in the mailing list thread, do we need to remove Ghostscript from the other packages? Win32? Snap? AppImage? | Nov 06 10:03 |
| bryce | so the discussions currently are around how to get Inkscape back to 100% GPLv2. The SFC lawyers did a code review and found a few items that need investigation | Nov 06 10:03 |
| ReneDH | Personally I think this is not a macOS-only problem but Windows as well. | Nov 06 10:03 |
| ReneDH | Ah, what tedg said | Nov 06 10:04 |
| inkchatbot | <doctormo> It's not just the Apple Store, they've identified a problem with us having a GPLv3 dmg of any kind AFAIK. | Nov 06 10:04 |
| bryce | ReneDH, oh I didn't hear it was for Windows as well? | Nov 06 10:04 |
| Mc | @Tav btw I think ghostscript makes our ps support, btw ? | Nov 06 10:04 |
| ReneDH | No, they are not looking at Windows right now. But I think they (and we!) should. | Nov 06 10:04 |
| tedg | Well the question is about including system libraries as part of the package. The question is "What is system libraries?" kinda. | Nov 06 10:04 |
| ReneDH | GPL violation with proprietary tech is not an Apple-only thing. | Nov 06 10:05 |
| tedg | I think ghostscript is mostly used for EPS support. Which is important, but loosing traction. There is a lot of logos that are still EPS. | Nov 06 10:05 |
| ReneDH | I'm not including any system libraries in the package. It's about linking to system libraries. | Nov 06 10:05 |
| inkchatbot | <Tav> @ Mc I'm not actually sure. | Nov 06 10:05 |
| Mc | SFC actually already reviewed microsoft store rules | Nov 06 10:06 |
| Mc | and told there were ok | Nov 06 10:06 |
| inkchatbot | <Tav> If Ghostscript is only for converting EPS to PostScript we can probably write a converter ourselves. | Nov 06 10:06 |
| tedg | Ah, good they reviewed that. | Nov 06 10:06 |
| inkchatbot | <Tav> If it's for reading in PostScript then it's much more difficult. | Nov 06 10:06 |
| ReneDH | It's EPS and one format that I don't recall right now... | Nov 06 10:06 |
| bryce | what's the licensing on ghostscript? | Nov 06 10:06 |
| Mc | one year ago | Nov 06 10:06 |
| tedg | AGPLv3 | Nov 06 10:06 |
| bryce | ah | Nov 06 10:07 |
| bryce | it feels we may want to be able to track each of these issues, do we have tickets open for them? | Nov 06 10:07 |
| tedg | Eh, sounds like they're resolved? Which question is left? | Nov 06 10:08 |
| Mc | (actually, iirc ms has an explicit rule that any term that they might have that contradicts an OSI-approved license does not apply to any program distributed on that OSI license) | Nov 06 10:08 |
| tedg | (If the MS store is okay, I'm sure the OSS ones are) | Nov 06 10:08 |
| inkchatbot | <doctormo> It would be odd for an AppImage to cause GPLv3 problems. | Nov 06 10:08 |
| bryce | tedg, for the apple store, the remaining items that have license issues, e.g. ghostscript, gsl, gimp widgets... | Nov 06 10:08 |
| Mc | @doctormo maybe snap then :D | Nov 06 10:09 |
| ReneDH | One more thing about Ghostscript: we're using their binaries to achieve the import. So this can be worked around on the user's end. (with a little help from us) | Nov 06 10:09 |
| inkchatbot | <doctormo> Mc: _Thanos snap._ | Nov 06 10:09 |
| bryce | if there's items that need replaced then a bug to track that work would be helpful. If the item is deemed ok as is, then the ticket would serve as documentation of our position. | Nov 06 10:10 |
| inkchatbot | <c.rogers> someone was complaining on Facebook about the eps extension not working correctly. | Nov 06 10:10 |
| inkchatbot | <doctormo> I believe it's not available in windows for a technical reason. | Nov 06 10:10 |
| tedg | I think the other thing we should probably do is push the SFC to writeup a post on what they found. It makes a difference to more folks than us, and would give us something to link to. | Nov 06 10:11 |
| Mc | @c.rogers should we say that eps format is now deprecated and is no more supported ? :p | Nov 06 10:11 |
| bryce | tedg, maybe that and then create bugs after for specific items needing followed up? | Nov 06 10:11 |
| inkchatbot | <c.rogers> I'm sure that's not what they want to hear. :) | Nov 06 10:12 |
| inkchatbot | <c.rogers> I only see people using it when they have to use coreldraw to laser stuff. | Nov 06 10:12 |
| inkchatbot | <Tav> eps is used a lot in technical drawings. It's the format for TeX drawing. | Nov 06 10:12 |
| tedg | bryce: I think that might be good, give context to the bug. Otherwise we'll have to explain a lot. | Nov 06 10:13 |
| inkchatbot | <doctormo> Mc: Check the horror faces from some users on twitter when I suggested eps might go away. | Nov 06 10:13 |
| inkchatbot | <ScislaC> Honestly, for SCALE we still get probably 1/3 of the logos or ads in EPS too... | Nov 06 10:14 |
| bryce | it's not that drastic though, is it doctormo? it's just a question of if we can ship the code, not whether or not we can be compatible with it. So if I understand correctly it'd just mean they'd have to install a second package? | Nov 06 10:15 |
| bryce | if we're just calling an exe and not actually linking code | Nov 06 10:15 |
| ReneDH | That's my understanding of how it works ^^. It looks for certain ps2... binaries in PATH. | Nov 06 10:16 |
| inkchatbot | <doctormo> extension eps_input uses `ps2pdf`, is this ghostscript? | Nov 06 10:16 |
| ReneDH | Yep | Nov 06 10:17 |
| bryce | ok, I can take the action of asking SFC for a blog post or similar public statement | Nov 06 10:17 |
| inkchatbot | <doctormo> that's ps_input and eps_input | Nov 06 10:17 |
| bryce | one other thing, they asked if KK could get involved to provide background on the gimp plugin licensing discussions, has anyone tried contacting him? | Nov 06 10:17 |
| inkchatbot | <doctormo> I searches the archives for the history, but couldn't find the specific files in question | Nov 06 10:18 |
| bryce | if not I can take that action as well | Nov 06 10:18 |
| inkchatbot | <doctormo> Doesn't sound like it. | Nov 06 10:18 |
| bryce | alright, I'll rope him in. | Nov 06 10:19 |
| tedg | 🤠| Nov 06 10:19 |
| bryce | any other comments on the licensing? still much a WIP unfortunately | Nov 06 10:19 |
| inkchatbot | <Tav> So we don't actually link to ghostscript. | Nov 06 10:19 |
| ReneDH | Once the licensing is done, they hopefully get back to the reimbursement that started this whole thing ;-) | Nov 06 10:20 |
| bryce | no kidding | Nov 06 10:20 |
| bryce | ReneDH, at least it's getting active attention from SFC and moving forward | Nov 06 10:20 |
| inkchatbot | <doctormo> We don't link to it via code, but we are shipping it in the packages. | Nov 06 10:20 |
| bryce | === Developer meeting update (Mc / Tav) === | Nov 06 10:21 |
| bryce | Mc and Tav, want to fill us in on status? | Nov 06 10:22 |
| Mc | devs meetings are still live discussions among active developers ^^ | Nov 06 10:22 |
| inkchatbot | <Tav> About 5 or 6 people show up. Quite useful. | Nov 06 10:22 |
| Mc | anyone is encouraged to attend, if you feel like discussing code-related matters | Nov 06 10:22 |
| inkchatbot | <doctormo> Release schedule set, everyone has a good sense of what others are focused on. | Nov 06 10:23 |
| tedg | Anything exciting with the proposed 1.1 schedule? Do we need to do anything for that? | Nov 06 10:23 |
| Mc | not on the board side | Nov 06 10:23 |
| inkchatbot | <Tav> https://wiki.inkscape.org/wiki/index.php?title=Inkscape_1.1_Release_Planning | Nov 06 10:23 |
| inkchatbot | <doctormo> _thinks we should create a release manager grant and pay someone to do a lot of the leg work for 1.1_ | Nov 06 10:23 |
| inkchatbot | <Tav> Mc has volunteered to handle the developer side... he can't be paid though. | Nov 06 10:24 |
| ReneDH | Well I'm not donating to Wikipedia this year, so ... | Nov 06 10:24 |
| tedg | I don't think that it is a bad idea, I'm just not sure how it works practically. | Nov 06 10:25 |
| tedg | Not sure anyone would take on release management as a fixed price contract. | Nov 06 10:25 |
| inkchatbot | <Tav> It would be good to have a Vector's volunteer to keep track of things like release note preparation. | Nov 06 10:25 |
| inkchatbot | <Tav> Website prep, etc. | Nov 06 10:26 |
| tedg | Yes, has the release schedule been presented at a vector's meeting? | Nov 06 10:26 |
| inkchatbot | <doctormo> Set a fixed amount of money we want to set aside, ask for advice from the SFC, contract the person we want to do the work. | Nov 06 10:26 |
| inkchatbot | <c.rogers> I have gaps in my work schedule which I could be bribed to fill with release schedule info/ videos, etc. | Nov 06 10:26 |
| Mc | vectors meeting are monthly (tomorrow ?) | Nov 06 10:26 |
| inkchatbot | <Moini> Sure. | Nov 06 10:26 |
| inkchatbot | <c.rogers> If you wan to increase hype for stuff. | Nov 06 10:26 |
| ReneDH | (yes tomorrow) | Nov 06 10:26 |
| inkchatbot | <Tav> I'm hoping the vector's team will give us some feedback on the release schedule tomorrow. | Nov 06 10:27 |
| inkchatbot | <c.rogers> Is someone already doin git? | Nov 06 10:27 |
| tedg | Cool, there would be a good place to plan the otherside of the release prep. | Nov 06 10:27 |
| bryce | thanks, sorry I haven't attended them, Saturday morning has been family time for me | Nov 06 10:28 |
| inkchatbot | <Moini> Sorry, the app doesn't work properly for me right now. | Nov 06 10:28 |
| Mc | rocketchat ? | Nov 06 10:28 |
| inkchatbot | <Moini> Replies are not sent... yes. | Nov 06 10:28 |
| inkchatbot | <c.rogers> DO you want a video for the next release? | Nov 06 10:29 |
| Mc | bryce: where are we for shared access to that, btw ? | Nov 06 10:29 |
| inkchatbot | <doctormo> @c.rogers I'm not sure we do. | Nov 06 10:29 |
| inkchatbot | <c.rogers> Okay | Nov 06 10:29 |
| inkchatbot | <Moini> Ah, now it seems to work. Been saying that I've been planning to take care of vectors' organisation and release notes. | Nov 06 10:29 |
| bryce | Mc, to the rocketchat instance? I can give you root access but was kind of waiting for recena to give his input | Nov 06 10:30 |
| tedg | I think whether there's a video would be a good discussion for the vector's meeting. | Nov 06 10:30 |
| Mc | no, to VM administration in general | Nov 06 10:30 |
| Mc | (to the rocketchat instance would probably be good too) | Nov 06 10:30 |
| tedg | They're good for drumming up excitement, but perhaps we don't need as significant of one. | Nov 06 10:30 |
| inkchatbot | <Moini> tedg, yes. | Nov 06 10:30 |
| tedg | Moini, sounds awesome, thanks for taking that on. | Nov 06 10:31 |
| inkchatbot | <doctormo> I'm doing a video every week, just point people to my OpenShot wizardry :-P | Nov 06 10:32 |
| bryce | Mc, access to that effectively gives root access on all Inkscape services. I'm not comfortable with that being a general access thing. | Nov 06 10:32 |
| inkchatbot | <Tav> @ Moini , so we can put your name down as the Vector's release coordinator on the release planning page? | Nov 06 10:32 |
| Mc | what do you mean "general access" ? | Nov 06 10:33 |
| Mc | I'm not asking to post the password on twitter | Nov 06 10:33 |
| inkchatbot | <doctormo> bryce: the machines need to be accessible to multiple people. | Nov 06 10:34 |
| inkchatbot | <doctormo> A bus factor of 1 is very bad. | Nov 06 10:35 |
| bryce | the account is registered through SFC, so if you want to run me over with your bus you can always recover it through them. | Nov 06 10:35 |
| inkchatbot | <doctormo> bryce that's obstructionist. I'm not asking for anything unreasonable, just shared out access. | Nov 06 10:36 |
| inkchatbot | <Moini> [ ](https://chat.inkscape.org/channel/team_devel?msg=9vfypoy5sZsWsPeuH) @ Tav Yes (sorry for delay, booted up my computer instead) | Nov 06 10:36 |
| inkchatbot | <Tav> @ Moini Excellent! | Nov 06 10:36 |
| tedg | I think we're probably done with the dev meeting, can we move on to vectors? | Nov 06 10:37 |
| bryce | alright | Nov 06 10:38 |
| bryce | === Vectors update (ryangorley) === | Nov 06 10:38 |
| bryce | ryan are you present? | Nov 06 10:38 |
| inkchatbot | <Moini> Ryan can't be here in the next time. He's okay, but there was a death in his family, AFAIU. | Nov 06 10:39 |
| bryce | oh, sorry to hear. | Nov 06 10:39 |
| inkchatbot | <doctormo> @ Tim are you available for this meeting (last minute) | Nov 06 10:39 |
| bryce | Moini, can you fill in or should we move on? | Nov 06 10:39 |
| inkchatbot | <Moini> I haven't checked the agenda yet. | Nov 06 10:40 |
| bryce | ok, we can move on | Nov 06 10:40 |
| bryce | === Board structure progress (ted) === | Nov 06 10:40 |
| inkchatbot | <Moini> Ah, Vectors update. | Nov 06 10:40 |
| tedg | Oh, Moini, do you want to update? | Nov 06 10:41 |
| bryce | tedg, you're up | Nov 06 10:41 |
| inkchatbot | <Moini> Nothing new, AFAIK, except for Ryan not being available. | Nov 06 10:41 |
| tedg | Okay. So I've gotten some work on getting the charter digitized. | Nov 06 10:41 |
| tedg | Unfortuantely I've just not gotten a lot of time for it. | Nov 06 10:41 |
| tedg | I'm planning now on making it into a Git branch. | Nov 06 10:41 |
| tedg | Because it turns out, we made the resolutions very independent, so there's gonna be some judgement calls. | Nov 06 10:42 |
| inkchatbot | <doctormo> For the drafting process? | Nov 06 10:42 |
| bryce | would it make sense to narrow the focus so it won't need as much time? | Nov 06 10:42 |
| tedg | So I'd like everyone to see what I made (and correct mistakes I make) independently. | Nov 06 10:42 |
| tedg | Naw, I think it's something we have to do. We've just let it atrophe. | Nov 06 10:42 |
| tedg | But now that I have working hot water heaters (literally plumber just left) I hope to have less going on and can work on it. | Nov 06 10:43 |
| tedg | Anyway, so just an apology there. | Nov 06 10:44 |
| inkchatbot | <NPJ2000> My house is also being renovated, @ tedg - I can empathize. | Nov 06 10:44 |
| bryce | ok, on to next item then | Nov 06 10:44 |
| bryce | === Budget and Financial Report (ted) === | Nov 06 10:44 |
| tedg | @NPJ2000, when COVID is done, a beer an complain session 😉 | Nov 06 10:45 |
| tedg | So, I thought that was all set and I was going to get a report this morning to share. | Nov 06 10:45 |
| tedg | Apparently I was wrong because I didn't get a report. | Nov 06 10:45 |
| inkchatbot | <doctormo> No information from the SFC yet on fiscal situation? | Nov 06 10:45 |
| tedg | I will follow up. I'm trying to just get a publicly sharable report (no personal informaiton in it) | Nov 06 10:46 |
| tedg | But we may have to build that ourselves. | Nov 06 10:46 |
| tedg | Was hoping to find that out today, but clearly there is work to do there. | Nov 06 10:46 |
| inkchatbot | <doctormo> Great, either way the data is accessible. | Nov 06 10:46 |
| tedg | So, I'll work out the bugs. Next month! | Nov 06 10:46 |
| bryce | thanks, and yeah hopefully future SFC data comes more readily | Nov 06 10:47 |
| bryce | === Adjust board meeting times? (doctormo) === | Nov 06 10:47 |
| bryce | doctomo? | Nov 06 10:47 |
| inkchatbot | <doctormo> The meeting for the board needs to be fixed at a UTC time, | Nov 06 10:47 |
| tedg | Why does it need to be? | Nov 06 10:48 |
| Mc | s/needs to/could/ | Nov 06 10:48 |
| inkchatbot | <doctormo> The is to make it consistant with other meetings and international calendaring. | Nov 06 10:48 |
| inkchatbot | <doctormo> A situation where an event floats around can cause not just confusion, but collisions with other meetings. | Nov 06 10:48 |
| tedg | International calendaring has worked before and without UTC for years 😉 | Nov 06 10:49 |
| bryce | if it is set to UTC time, that would move it 1 hour earlier my time? | Nov 06 10:49 |
| bryce | if that's correct, I would not be able to attend | Nov 06 10:49 |
| inkchatbot | <doctormo> It doesn't have to, it would just move it when the summer time hits. | Nov 06 10:49 |
| inkchatbot | <doctormo> So adjusting the current time out by one hour today, means it's the same time until next summer time. | Nov 06 10:49 |
| inkchatbot | <doctormo> then it pushes forward by an hour. | Nov 06 10:50 |
| tedg | But we can have the automatically if we anchor it to a timezone that does daylight savings we get that for free? | Nov 06 10:50 |
| inkchatbot | <NPJ2000> Ah hoc scheduling with a glimpse toward the future could work, too? | Nov 06 10:50 |
| tedg | Like the computers will do it for us. | Nov 06 10:50 |
| inkchatbot | <doctormo> The other important point is I'd like to make sure that *whatever* the situation, the website calendar is considered canonical. | Nov 06 10:51 |
| bryce | what website calendar? | Nov 06 10:52 |
| inkchatbot | <doctormo> This meeting clearly has copies, and that has a future danger of causing confusion (for any number of reasons) say if we need to adjust the time for bryce by a few hours one month. | Nov 06 10:52 |
| inkchatbot | <doctormo> bryce: https://inkscape.org/cals/event/2/ | Nov 06 10:52 |
| tedg | I guess I kinda like the wiki page being canonical. Seems easier to work with. | Nov 06 10:52 |
| Mc | does not have an ical link | Nov 06 10:52 |
| bryce | no I don't think we make the website define the meeting time, we define the meeting time and the website can reflect that | Nov 06 10:52 |
| tedg | Also if we move to a different CMS we don't need it to support calendaring (which seems weird for a CMS) | Nov 06 10:53 |
| inkchatbot | <doctormo> tedg: the website is not a CMS | Nov 06 10:53 |
| tedg | What do you consider it? | Nov 06 10:53 |
| inkchatbot | <doctormo> A website | Nov 06 10:53 |
| Mc | ^^ | Nov 06 10:54 |
| tedg | Hmm, seems like it's gotten too custom then IMHO. | Nov 06 10:54 |
| Mc | it has always been very, very custom | Nov 06 10:54 |
| tedg | Anyway, that's off topic. | Nov 06 10:55 |
| bryce | back to utc vs daylight savings, there are changes afoot in the US to move to a fixed time anyway | Nov 06 10:56 |
| inkchatbot | <Tav> And in Europe too... | Nov 06 10:56 |
| bryce | so it may be better to just leave things as is until that's clarified. The situation may end up solving itself. | Nov 06 10:56 |
| inkchatbot | <doctormo> One day the world will be perfect ;-) | Nov 06 10:56 |
| tedg | I think the meeting should be anchored to a timezone a board member lives in. Whether that be US or EU. I don't care which as much. | Nov 06 10:56 |
| bryce | for example, my own state has already voted to end it, but is blocked by federal stuff. | Nov 06 10:56 |
| inkchatbot | <doctormo> Right I'm setting it to c.rogers timezone, BST. It'll be this time again next time. Please subscribe to the ical for all events (not just a board meeting). | Nov 06 10:57 |
| bryce | tedg, I agree and also don't care whom it's linked to. California may make more sense than Oregon | Nov 06 10:57 |
| inkchatbot | <ScislaC> @ bryce your state also legalized shrooms, so there's that. ;) | Nov 06 10:58 |
| bryce | yes there's that.... | Nov 06 10:58 |
| Mc | and paris makes more sense than california | Nov 06 10:58 |
| ReneDH | Sorry I'm scratching my head that you can't settle for UTC | Nov 06 10:58 |
| tedg | I'm not going to subscibe to the ical. | Nov 06 10:58 |
| inkchatbot | <NPJ2000> Didn't they just decriminalize them at the state level? | Nov 06 10:58 |
| Mc | ReneDH: I tend to agree :) | Nov 06 10:58 |
| tedg | UTC isn't real life. It's a computer thing. It's like saying we should count in binary. | Nov 06 10:59 |
| inkchatbot | <doctormo> Subscription to all calendars here: https://inkscape.org/cals/ | Nov 06 10:59 |
| tedg | Or do the meetings in Esperanto | Nov 06 10:59 |
| bryce | alright, we're at the hour. | Nov 06 10:59 |
| bryce | the item can carry to next meeting. | Nov 06 10:59 |
| inkchatbot | <Tav> We skipped at item: Community Development | Nov 06 10:59 |
| bryce | oh sorry | Nov 06 11:00 |
| inkchatbot | <doctormo> We always skip items, we're really bad at these meetings. | Nov 06 11:00 |
| bryce | === Community and developer development. (Tav) === | Nov 06 11:00 |
| inkchatbot | <NPJ2000> We all have various schedules - having a early morning / late night shift ought to be able to incorporate most of the work when it is an eight to eleven hour difference? | Nov 06 11:00 |
| bryce | my bad, go ahead Tav | Nov 06 11:00 |
| inkchatbot | <Tav> I put together a web page: https://wiki.inkscape.org/wiki/index.php?title=Community_Development | Nov 06 11:00 |
| bryce | Tav that looks great | Nov 06 11:01 |
| tedg | Cool, are we actively seeking people to put there? Some folks my not want to put themselves. | Nov 06 11:01 |
| inkchatbot | <Tav> I'm thinking that we should allocate $1000 to the project: 25 books $40. (Probably that is very conservative.) | Nov 06 11:01 |
| tedg | Make sure people feel seen. | Nov 06 11:02 |
| inkchatbot | <Tav> We could add peoples names... I would be afraid of forgetting someone.... | Nov 06 11:02 |
| tedg | Does that include shipping? | Nov 06 11:02 |
| inkchatbot | <doctormo> @ Tav sounds reasonable to me. | Nov 06 11:02 |
| bryce | I expect SFC will also want to have someone validate that the people on the list do indeed meet the qualifications. Can you serve that role? (and document in the page) | Nov 06 11:02 |
| inkchatbot | <Tav> Sure... | Nov 06 11:02 |
| tedg | Seems like with shipping some may be more than $40 | Nov 06 11:02 |
| tedg | I guess 20 @ $50 is probably okay too. Not sure we'll get to 20 either. | Nov 06 11:03 |
| inkchatbot | <Tav> Depends upon where they are ordered. Amazon has free shipping most places (1 cent in France). | Nov 06 11:03 |
| bryce | or just bump the estimate up to $2000. We probably won't meet it and there's no particular reason to impose too strict a top limit | Nov 06 11:03 |
| tedg | + | Nov 06 11:04 |
| tedg | +1 | Nov 06 11:04 |
| bryce | and yes I recall there were some shipping situations last year that were a bit more expensive than others | Nov 06 11:04 |
| inkchatbot | <Tav> $2000 sounds good. The $1000 was just an estimated cost. | Nov 06 11:04 |
| inkchatbot | <doctormo> time to send a vote I think. Get the budget set up. | Nov 06 11:06 |
| bryce | Tav, would you like me to go ahead and draft a vote on this? I can probably do that today. | Nov 06 11:06 |
| inkchatbot | <Tav> @ bryce Yes, that sounds good. | Nov 06 11:06 |
| bryce | alright | Nov 06 11:06 |
| bryce | === Any Other Business === | Nov 06 11:06 |
| bryce | anything else before we close? | Nov 06 11:07 |
| tedg | Nope, thanks bryce ! | Nov 06 11:07 |
| Mc | nope, thanks | Nov 06 11:07 |
| Mc | see you next month ? | Nov 06 11:07 |
| bryce | alright, thanks and have a good weekend everyone! | Nov 06 11:07 |
| inkchatbot | <Tav> Is someone going to post the minutes? | Nov 06 11:07 |
| inkchatbot | <ScislaC> Thanks everyone | Nov 06 11:07 |
| bryce | I can take care of that | Nov 06 11:07 |
| inkchatbot | <Tav> See y'all. | Nov 06 11:08 |
| bryce | == End of Meeting == | Nov 06 11:08 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!